【you will be stripped eroticism】

The you will be stripped eroticismauto industry believes self-driving cars are the future of transportation and could be a key factor in preventing accidents, but the public is wary of autonomous vehicles (AVs). So companies are looking to find new ways to convince consumers that driverless cars are a good idea.

Now, Intel says it can actually demonstrate exactly how safe AVs can be — and believes it has the math to prove it.

Amnon Shashua, who is the SVP of Intel's Autonomous Driving Group and CEO of recently acquired Mobileye, just published an academic paper that claims to provide a mathematical formula that can be applied to AVs to make sure that they won't cause accidents on the road. Intel and Mobileye also released a "layman's summary paper" on the formula, for those of us who never advanced beyond basic algebra.

SEE ALSO: The 'Google of China' is working on a driverless bus for next year and fully self-driving cars by 2021

Shashua and his co-authors' solution describes a "Responsibility Sensitive Safety" model, which Intel believes can be used to create autonomous vehicles that will never be responsible for a car accident. The model describes scenarios in which AVs will use pre-programmed systems to behave safely, like a "Safe Distance Formula" to handle highway driving.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Importantly, the model isn't designed to eliminate allaccidents — the framers acknowledge that there will be human drivers on the road with driverless cars for "decades," and people will still make mistakes and crash their cars. We've already seen human-AV accidents during Google's (now Waymo) and Uber's on-road trials.

The point of the formula, then, is to take away any question of liability from the autonomous systems during those incidents, which is a far cry from eliminating crashes entirely. Intel believes that AVs operating with a Responsibility Sensitive Safety model will be essentially blameless, which is probably not the first thing you want to tell someone after a fender bender.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Unfortunately, this appears to be the type of reasoning that makes the public nervous about AVs in the first place. People are skeptical about the decision-making process behind AI systems in general, but particularly when it comes to self-driving cars.

The new Responsibility Sensitive Safety model could make AVs the most accident averse vehicles on the road, but for many, the only way they'd feel comfortable letting a robot take the wheel would be if they're guaranteed to have an absolute zero chance of a crash. Until humans stop driving, that's impossible — so maybe Intel should stick to trying to win the public over to driverless cars with LeBron James instead of math.

---

Featured Video For You

---

Someone disguised themselves as a car seat as an experiment

---

Topics Artificial Intelligence Intel Self-Driving Cars

• Life
• Digital Culture
• Entertainment
• Tech
• Deals
• Science
• Social Good
• Shopping

• Why are TikTok comments suddenly full of religious messages?
• Meet the best
• Cracked Fairy Tales and the Holocaust by Sabrina Orah Mark
• Paramount+ Black Friday deal: $2 per month
• Scientists find supercolony of penguins on the remote Danger Islands
• Writers’ Fridges: Olivia Laing
• 'Starfield' mod lets you step the hell back in conversations
• We Are the Subject: Diane Arbus, Rosalind Fox Solomon, and Lisette Model by Yevgeniya Traps
• Puerto Rico hurricane crisis: Here's why this could be Trump's Katrina
• Honoring Deborah Eisenberg by The Paris Review

• Using FreeSync with Nvidia GPUs Examined
• Blockchain Explained: How It Works, Who Cares and What Its Future May Hold
• Apple visionOS 26 brings new experiences to Vision Pro headsets
• Best Windows laptop deal: Save $250 on the Asus Zenbook A14
• What's Thermal Throttling and How to Prevent It
• Today's Hurdle hints and answers for June 11, 2025
• Portugal vs. France 2025 livestream: Watch U21 Euro 2025 for free
• 11 Myths About Buying a New 4K TV
• Galaxy S9+ vs Pixel 2 XL Camera
• Best TV deal: Buy a Samsung TV and get a Samsung Freestyle Projector for free

• Is 'Sing Sing' streaming? How to watch the A24 drama at home.
• ChatGPT and social media influencers: AI's effect on the creator economy
• 250+ best Walmart Cyber Monday deals (live now)
• Writers’ Cribs by Jane Mount
• Amazon Big Spring Sale 2025: Save $20 on Amazon Echo Show 5
• Dashiell Hammett's Strange Career by Anne Diebel
• NYT's The Mini crossword answers for November 27
• The Prevalence of Ritual: On Romare Bearden’s ‘Projections’
• Watch how an old Venus spacecraft tumbled before crashing to Earth
• Alain Mabanckou’s Masterfully Unstructured Novel of Addiction by Uzodinma Iweala

• Elon Musk's space Tesla actually served an engineering purpose
• Amazon Cyber Monday deals: 200+ of our favorite discounts from the holiday sale
• Cyber Monday Fire TV deals 2023: Amazon's sale is live
• Staff Picks: Butt Fumbles, Bounty Hunters, and Black
• Q&A with tendercare founder and CEO Shauna Sweeney
• Staff Picks: Butt Fumbles, Bounty Hunters, and Black
• Does Bad Romance Lead to Great Art? by Cody Delistraty
• Writers’ Cribs by Jane Mount
• Best monitor deal: Get $350 off the Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 gaming monitor at B&H Photo
• Cyber Monday Xbox deals 2023: Save $50 on an Xbox starter bundle and more