X (formerly Twitter) and the eroticization of gender: a materialist analysis of patriarchy and gender identityits owner Elon Musk have escaped a $500 million unpaid severance lawsuit, successfully petitioning a California court to dismiss the case. Even so, this doesn't mean the matter is over.
A district court judge dismissed the class action suit on Tuesday, accepting the defendants' argument that X's severance plan was not governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). As the plaintiffs had accused X and Musk of violating ERISA, this finding that it doesn't even apply brought their case to a grinding halt.
However, the court made no ruling concerning the facts of the case. In fact, the judge explicitly stated that the plaintiffs can amend and refile their complaint with other claims such as breach of contract or promissory estoppel.
Initially filed in July last year, the lawsuit accused X and Musk of failing to fulfil severance obligations owed to approximately 6,000 former employees. Musk famously began conducting mass layoffs mere days after acquiring Twitter in October 2022, cutting its workforce by at least 70 percent.
The complaint alleged that laid off employees were only offered a single month of severance pay, which fell short of the benefits detailed in the company's severance plan. Said plan had been in place since at least 2019, with Musk's merger agreement having stated that employees would be given severance and benefits "no less favorable than" those offered immediately prior to his takeover.
As such, the plaintiffs accused X and Musk of violating the ERISA through denial of benefits, breach of fiduciary duty, and failure to provide complete and accurate information about the severance plan.
X and Musk didn't specifically refute the allegations that it had withheld employees' entitlements. Instead, the defendants successfully targeted matters of jurisdiction.
For a severance plan to fall under ERISA, it must involve an "ongoing administrative program" under which severance claims and benefits are determined. The court found that X's plan involved no such program because it determined severance by applying set formulas and mathematical calculations rather than requiring discretionary analysis on a case-by-case basis. Thus, the ERISA does not apply.
Basically, the dismissal of this case doesn't necessarily mean that X has paid all severance it legally owes to the plaintiffs. It merely means that they may have to come at X with claims such as breach of contract instead of for violating federal labour laws. The plaintiffs have three weeks to file an amended complaint detailing any claims they may have which are unrelated to the ERISA.
Regardless of whether the plaintiffs do refile their complaint, X's legal woes surrounding its Musk-ordered layoffs are far from over. A group of former Twitter executives previously filed a $128 million severance suit in March, another brought a $19.3 million one in April, and last September Musk agreed to settlement regarding claims of unpaid severance by almost 2,000 former employees. Tuesday's order noted that at least six lawsuits have been brought against X regarding severance, as well as five relating to wages and discrimination.
Topics X/Twitter Elon Musk
Twitter burns Washington Post for criticism of Jane Austen's love lifeHow to change your name on ZoomWatch monster fire storms blow up into the atmosphere after record heatBitcast gives you sexual pleasure from your Bitcoin investmentsDemocrat Shelly Simonds wins Virginia race by a single voteMadame Tussauds trolls Disney over its horrific Trump robot50 best tweets that helped us cope throughout 2017I was struck by the Pixel camera curseHow to turn off comments on a Facebook postAdam Driver and Keanu Reeves got faceFacebook launches newsletter platform BulletinOlivia Munn speaks out on Hollywood harassmentElectric hypercar maker Rimac takes over VW's BugattiMadame Tussauds trolls Disney over its horrific Trump robotTesla Model S Plaid blasts off in reviews, even without a gear shifterYou're using your air fryer all wrongSurprise: iPhone 13 will (probably) be called iPhone 13Trump drinks water like a child and the internet immediately mocks himThis dad's stunned reaction to the suggestion of a fake Christmas tree has gone super viralI was struck by the Pixel camera curse An Interview with “Splendidly Cranky” Utopian Curtis White Trying to Find a Good Synonym for “Said”? Stop. Use “Said.” I Love You: How SmartReply Attempts to Mimic the Way We Talk There Are Those Who Knit, and Those Who Unravel... Our Winter Issue Is Here! Lish, Beckett, Lydia Davis, & More How Did Prison Change Oscar Wilde? On “De Profundis” Not “Purple Rain,” But “Blue Rain With a Little Red in It” That Time When Harry Truman Got a Menorah Ho, Ho, Ho—A Silly Symphony with a Frankly Terrifying Santa Claus The Way We Were by Clare Fentress Agustin Fernandez Mallo Retraces Nietzsche’s Footsteps A Brief History of Christmas Trees as Political Lightning Rods Retail Therapy: Notes on Giving and Shopping The Continuing Adventures of Helvetica Man, and Other News The Strugatsky Brothers’ Sci Addy Walker, American Girl Holiday Sale: Gift Subscriptions Get Our New Anthology, Free Kay Nielsen’s Stunning Illustrations for “East of the Sun...” Holiday Travel A Brief Tour of Drugs in Fiction
3.2573s , 8286.734375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【the eroticization of gender: a materialist analysis of patriarchy and gender identity】,Wisdom Convergence Information Network