If you’re seeing TikTok posts with a circle made up of yellow,Sorority red, orange, blue, and green bars with a symbol in the middle, this may or may not be your first contact with American pastor and author Gary Chapman’s “5 Love Languages” concept.
The quiz in question lives on Chapman’s official site, and it’s probably harmless. If you’re curious about your own "Love Language," try it. It’s fun.
Is it rooted in science? Not really, no. Is it a cult, or some other form of indoctrination? Also no. It comes from a bestselling book from 1992 called The Five Love Languages: How to Express Heartfelt Commitment to Your Mate, by Chapman that millions of people have found insightful.
The Love Languages according to Gary Chapman are as follows:
Physical Touch
Acts of Service
Words of Affirmation
Quality Time
Receiving Gifts
The online quiz asks you A vs. B questions in an effort to nail down your priorities, and zero in on the emotional needs your partner or partners need to address in order to make you feel loved, and maintain your relationship. Your quiz results may or may not even result in one dominant "Love Language," so the utility of the quiz varies from person to person. But knowing more about your preferences, and knowing how a partner feels, allows all parties to rethink their relationship behaviors.
For instance, if you feel your top "Love Language" is quality time, and you have a spouse who professes to need gifts, that might explain a birthday fight in which your "gift" of a night in with Netflix wasn’t well received, even though the thought behind it was earnest. Common sense-wise, getting something like this out into the open could be a relationship-saving insight.
Chapman’s "Love Languages" concept may not be the the end-all be all of relationship wisdom, and his books aren’t the product of falsifiable studies. It’s also not the first work to sort the features of what’s known in social science as "relational maintenance" into five categories.
SEE ALSO: Best dating sites for working professionals who don't have time to meet people IRLSocial science research in this area includes — to cite just one example — Laura Stafford and Daniel J. Canary’s "Maintenance Strategies and Romantic Relationship Type, Gender and Relational Characteristics," a study published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships in 1991, the year before Chapman’s book. Their work, an example of "relational maintenance" research, involved asking 956 participants to fill out a survey. The researchers sorted the results into five "factor loadings of maintenance items": "positivity," "openness," "assurance," "network," and "tasks."
At any rate, social science research attempting to validate the general principles of Chapman's book have actually shown promise. Nichole Egbert of Kent State University and Denise Polk West Chester University devised "A Validity Test of Chapman's (1992) Five Love Languages" in 2006, published in the journal Communication Research Reports. They find that Chapman’s work, and the world of relational maintenance are simpatico. People acting based on Chapman’s advice, they assert, are engaging in “behaviors performed to enact intended relational maintenance.”
So like anything else you read online, you should be careful not to base your whole life around this quiz. But if you find useful wisdom in it, you’re not alone.
Previous:Entitlements
Next:Mind Out of Time
The Treasures That Prevail: On the Prose of Adrienne Rich by Sandra M. GilbertMs. Lucy's Steamboat by Jason NovakSchiele, Shoes, and Kavanaugh by Larissa PhamRedux: Such Is the Way with Monumental Things by The Paris ReviewA Tour of Diane Williams's Art Collection by Zach Davidson, Madelaine Lucas and Liza St. JamesThe Last of French Seventies Counterculture by Stephanie LaCavaLeonor Fini: Theatre of Desire by The Paris ReviewWriters’ Cribs by Jane MountWhere Do We Go When We Read?Cracked Fairy Tales and the Holocaust by Sabrina Orah MarkAnnouncing Our New Editors by Emily NemensStaff Picks: Butt Fumbles, Bounty Hunters, and BlackRedux: The Whims of Men by The Paris ReviewObligatory Readings by Alejandro ZambraUgliness Is Underrated: Ugly Design by Katy KelleherLate Art by Anna Ostoya and Ben LernerThe Prevalence of Ritual: On Romare Bearden’s ‘Projections’Poetry Rx: This Gloom is Someone Else’s by Sarah KayThe Moment of DistractionStaff Picks: Documentaries, Snapshots, and Glossy Color Images by The Paris Review Meta’s excludes paid ads from Community Notes NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for January 22: Tips to solve Connections #121 6 Trump Inauguration speech highlights — and how the internet reacted China's DeepSeek AI might be smarter than OpenAI's smartest AI Washington Wizards vs. Los Angeles Lakers 2025 livestream: Watch NBA online Portland Trail Blazers vs. Miami Heat 2025 livestream: Watch NBA online Best Xbox Elite Series 2 deal: Save $32 on this pro Sabalenka vs. Pavlyuchenkova 2025 livestream: Watch Australian Open for free Best QLED TV deal: Save $430 on Samsung 85 NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for January 21: Tips to solve Connections #120 What drives John Cena? The 'What Drives You' host speaks out Best Garmin deal: Save $50 on Garmin vívoactive 5 Melania Trump's inauguration hat is fueling lots of reactions on social media Meta is reportedly paying influencers big bucks to post on Reels before TikTok Trump admin deletes all LGBTQ pages on White House site Best Samsung Galaxy Watch deal: Save $80 on Galaxy Watch 7 Notre Dame vs. Ohio State 2025 livestream: Watch College Football Playoff Championship Samsung Galaxy AI features leak ahead of Unpacked 2025 NYT Connections hints and answers for January 21: Tips to solve 'Connections' #590. Monaco vs. Aston Villa 2025 livestream: Watch Champions League for free
1.6922s , 8222.9765625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Sorority】,Wisdom Convergence Information Network