There's a certain kind of person who will happily drop $999 (or $1,alyce mahon introduction to eroticism and art 2007149 for the 256GB version, all before tax) on the Apple iPhone X when it launches Nov. 3. You probably know at least one of them; some of my best friends are among their number.
It isn't enough to describe these consumers as mere early adopters. Their mania for the latest thing is so strong, it outweighs all worries about privacy and price; it erases all concern over facial scanning and the odd glass back, all doubts about whether you really need a "Super Retina" screen or whether animoji is a novelty you'll use for five days at most.
SEE ALSO: Apple unveils iPhone X, and you'll never look at phones the same againThere's a large overlap between these iPhone X-heads and the people who rushed to be part of the Google Glass program. And more power to them. Where would we be without our pioneers?
For the rest of us, however, the iPhone X may go down in history as the ultimate example of a high-tech folly.
Why? Well, first of all, for the price you're paying for this pocket device, you could have a nice new Apple laptop, the MacBook Air. And for $999, you'd get twice the storage (64GB for the basic iPhone X, 128GB for the Air.)
You read that right: For a thousand bucks, you get 64 measly gigabytes on what is ostensibly the most advanced phone of our age. For an extra $150, you get 256GB, which swings to the opposite end of the spectrum: it's more than most people need. There is no 128GB iPhone X.
Then there's just the pure, full-on, freaky Nineteen Eighty-Four-style weirdness of having your phone scan your face the whole time, just so you won't have to suffer the indignity of securely unlocking your phone by pressing on a button.
Talk about a problem no one was looking to solve.
Front-facing face-scanning tech isn't even that new. Amazon's Fire Phone had four face-scanning cameras in 2014; it could deliver 3D stereoscopic vision because it always knew where your eyes were.
A neat trick. And, as it turned out, completely unwanted in a consumer product.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Let's not even get into the reasons why you shouldn't let Apple look at your face all the time. My colleague Jack Morse has a deeper dive on that; the money quote is the security researcher who describes the tech as "like setting your password to 'password' then tattooing it on your forehead."
Apple marketing chief Phil Schiller tried to calm our fears by claiming that only one in a million people would have a face similar enough to yours to unlock the phone. Which sounds nice and secure, until you realize that means at least 323 people could imitate you in the United States alone.
Nothing like surprising your friends and family by making your words come out of a unicorn or a talking poop!
Facial-scanning jokes and fears proliferated quickly on social media. At a time when concerns about authorities intruding on your digital data are at an all time high, the idea of a phone that the police can unlock by pointing it at your face does not necessarily have wide appeal.
(In theory you could force a passcode reset by tapping the phone five times, but who's going to remember to do that in a stressful arrest situation?)
And at the other end of the spectrum, fears that it may not work at all were stoked when Apple's senior VP of engineering, Craig Federighi, was unable to unlock his iPhone X during Tuesday's launch event.
All this for a tiny extra piece of screen real estate and the convenience of not using your thumb? You'd have to be the most rabid of early adopters to accept that bargain.
The animated emoji feature that follows your face seems creepy, though it might appeal to some folks. Nothing like surprising your friends and family by making your words come out of a unicorn or a talking poop!
The novelty of this concept is likely to fade within a few days -- especially if you own an iPhone X and none of your friends do. They'll still be able to see your animoji, but be unable to respond in kind. In time, sending one would single you out just as much as the blinking red light on your Google Glass.
If history is any guide, we may never find out how many consumers fall for Apple's high-priced folly. The company doesn't break out sales of the Apple Watch, much less individual iPhones. If the X does have disappointing sales this holiday season, Apple will be able to sweep that fact under the rug and move on.
If you're still determined to get this first-generation device, more power to you. Just remember, being a pioneer isn't all it's cracked up to be. Especially not at this price.
Topics Apple iPhone
Rita Bullwinkel, Fiction by Rita BullwinkelMegha Majumdar, Fiction by Megha MajumdarWriting Is a Monstrous Act: A Conversation with Hernan Diaz by Rhian SasseenRemembering Richard Howard by Craig Morgan TeicherOn Watery Artworks and WritingThe Sixties Diaries by Ted BerriganWhy TikTok's For You page isn't a safe space for womenOscars 2024: The 7 biggest snubs from the Academy Award nominationsDoes the Parent Own the Child’s Body?: On Taryn Simon’s Sleep by Rachel CuskMatch Group buys sapphic app HER: What's next?Postcards from Ellsworth by Rebecca BengalDiary, 2010 by Adam LevinHow to reopen closed tabsWriting Is a Monstrous Act: A Conversation with Hernan Diaz by Rhian SasseenClaire Boyles, Fiction by Claire Boyles‘Palworld’ by the numbers — and they're big numbersHow 'True Detective: Night Country' pulled off its most WTF momentDell vs HP: Which laptop brand is right for you?Taylor Swift and shirtless Jason Kelce put on a show at the Chiefs, Bills game2024 Oscar nominations: See the full list An Egyptian Vase by Jago Rackham NYT's The Mini crossword answers for January 29 6 scientists are living like they're on Mars for the next 8 months Inertia by Kate Zambreno ‘Google Assistant with Bard’ demo leaks — here’s what it can do with your photos The Review’s Review: Don Carlo and the Abuse of Power by Krithika Varagur Dear Mother by Colm Tóibín SpaceX's breathtaking bullseye rocket landing in gifs On Butterflies by Hermann Hesse Get the M2 MacBook Air at its lowest price at Best Buy Will Taylor Swift attend the Super Bowl? What we know. On Anzia Yezierska’s Bread Givers by Deborah Feldman The Birder by Maisie Wiltshire On Mary Wollstonecraft by Joanna Biggs Nancy Lemann Recommends The Palace Papers and Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises by Nancy Lemann Americans Abroad by Andrew Martin Best Roborock deal: Save 43% on the Roborock Q5+ robot vacuum Mapping Africatown: Albert Murray and his Hometown by Nick Tabor and Kern M. Jackson NYT's The Mini crossword answers for January 30 It’s Nineteen Seventy
2.903s , 10193.640625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【alyce mahon introduction to eroticism and art 2007】,Wisdom Convergence Information Network