UPDATE: Dec. 18,homo eroticism aquaman 2024, 11:36 a.m. EST This story was updated after the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear challenges on the TikTok ban.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) formally appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to block the expected TikTok ban, which looms over the social media company as January approaches. Meanwhile, TikTok had made its own case for intervention — and the court has now responded to the call.
"The Constitution imposes an extraordinarily high bar on this kind of mass censorship. The Supreme Court should take up this important case and protect the rights of millions of Americans to freely express themselves and engage with others around the world," wrote deputy director of ACLU’s National Security Project Patrick Toomey in the appeal. The amicus brief was submitted on Dec. 17 by the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.
On Dec. 18, the U.S. Supreme Court formally agreed to hear challenges filed by TikTok and ByteDance, with oral arguments scheduled for Jan. 10.
TikTok and its allies have called the ban a violation of the First Amendment right to free speech, and the company has consistently denied any connections to Chinese government intelligence or the sharing of American users' data, which is the leading justification for the forced divestment of TikTok from Chinese ownership.
SEE ALSO: Get ready for these scams in 2025Barring a decision by the highest court, the ban, signed by President Biden in April, will go into effect Jan. 19. TikTok could have divested from its parent company, ByteDance, to comply with the law and halt an outright ban, but it had resisted any sale, most likely pending another court decision. Earlier this week, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied an emergency injunction submitted by TikTok that would delay the ban's effect until the Supreme Court could render an opinion under strict scrutiny. The Appeals court argued that highest scrutiny had been reached, and that national security interests justified the U.S. government's action.
The ACLU and its partners argued the court's reasoning was incorrect. "The D.C. Circuit failed to fully address the law’s profound implications for the First Amendment rights of the 170 million Americans who use TikTok," wrote the ACLU. "While the lower court’s decision correctly recognized that the statute triggers First Amendment scrutiny, it barely addressed users’ First Amendment interests in speaking, sharing, and receiving information on the platform. The court also perplexingly attempted to cast the government’s ban on TikTok as a vindication of users’ First Amendment rights, which it is not."
The ACLU has retained that the TikTok ban is a violation of federally protected rights, including free speech, calling the forceable sale "unconstitutional" in a statement released in March. A few months prior the civil rights organization argued that a ban on any such social media app would be "a dangerous act of censorship."
"Restricting citizens’ access to foreign media is a practice that has long been associated with repressive regimes," wrote Jameel Jaffer, executive director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, "and we should be very wary of letting the practice take root here."
Topics Social Good TikTok Politics
Google might bring the Pixel's exclusive Assistant to the Nexus 5X and 6PHere's Luke Bryan singing the national anthem at the Super Bowl, if you want to check that outWorld's most excited tiny surfer is freakin' stoked to be back on 'Ellen'The White House just brutally burned Australia's Prime MinisterWatch the exciting 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2' Super Bowl spot6 things to look forward to in Super Bowl LI if you're really into referees38 times Stephen King absolutely slammed Donald Trump on TwitterSexy Mr. Clean just turned on everyone watching the Super BowlThe FCC is already declining to enforce net neutralityThe FCC is already declining to enforce net neutralityScientists filmed something outrageous riding on a sharkGoogle might bring the Pixel's exclusive Assistant to the Nexus 5X and 6PInspirational thread proves you can still find hope on Twitter in Trump's AmericaInspirational thread proves you can still find hope on Twitter in Trump's America6 things to look forward to in Super Bowl LI if you're really into refereesThe White House just brutally burned Australia's Prime Minister'The Lego Batman Movie' is a popThe White House just brutally burned Australia's Prime MinisterSexy Mr. Clean just turned on everyone watching the Super BowlThe first 'Harry Potter' book will soon get an anniversary makeover 2019 was the year 'cancel culture' took on a gorgeously messy life of its own This Twitter game imagines a world where movie actors are replaced by Muppets Schools take note: This district will let students skip class to protest 'Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker' has a 'Harry Potter Cursed Child' problem How to celebrate Hanukkah in VR Chelsea Clinton is writing a children's book, and its title is just perfect Obama praises book that slams his White House for its Google relationship Influencers get pushback for support of Saudi Arabia PR campaign Obama can't even go on vacation without starting a conspiracy theory 2019 was the year of the chicken sandwich Samsung accidentally confirms 5G Australia's 1.2 Cool blue phone cases inspired by Pantone's color of the year 'Rise of Skywalker' is Star Wars' past. 'The Mandalorian' is its future. 'John Mulaney and the Sack Lunch Bunch' review: A true Netflix gem Superhero comics creators: we're political, and always have been Reminder: Lena Dunham doesn’t give ‘the tiniest of shits’ what you think about her body 10 'Saturday Night Live' sketches that made us scream in 2019 Unbanked, credit card White House sends satirical news story by accident in daily newsletter and do you guys even read
1.7995s , 10195.875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【homo eroticism aquaman】,Wisdom Convergence Information Network