Mark Zuckerberg has taken the unprecedented step of personally defending Facebook's business model in print.
Rather than write a screed on En la intimidadhis own Facebook page, Zuckerberg chose to put in in the form of a 1,000-word article for the Wall Street Journal.
Titled "The Facts About Facebook," Zuckerberg's column focused on his company's advertising strategy and handling of user data. "I want to explain the principles of how we operate," it begins, before explaining that his free service needs ads to support it.
SEE ALSO: Surprise! Facebook's ad targeting makes people uncomfortable, study saysThe op-ed comes in the wake of months of criticism over Facebook data privacy scandals, such as the Cambridge Analytica controversy. It also comes ahead of federal data privacy legislation, which legal experts expect will pass in 2019.
While admitting the company's data dealings can "feel opaque" and cause distrust, Zuckerberg insisted: "We don’t sell people’s data, even though it’s often reported that we do."
He added: "selling people’s information to advertisers would be counter to our business interests, because it would reduce the unique value of our service to advertisers. We have a strong incentive to protect people’s information from being accessed by anyone else."
Given the aim to be transparent, it's ironic that he wasn't clear on several fronts. First off: why choose the Wall Street Journal? The paper's notoriously hard-right editorial pages are not exactly a choice of venue designed to win over critics on the left.
Facebook spokesperson Elisabeth Diana told Business Insiderthere was "no real rationale" behind the choice, and that the Journal"is read in several countries." With 119 million followers on his public page, however, there's a good chance a post from Zuckerberg would also be read in several countries.
Zuckerberg was right about one thing: most people aren't comfortable with Facebook's ad targeting practices. But he maintained that users are in control: "You can find out why you’re seeing an ad and change your preferences to get ads you’re interested in. And you can use our transparency tools to see every different ad an advertiser is showing to anyone else."
He also said that when Facebook asked people for permission to use their information for ads in compliance with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, "the vast majority agreed because they prefer more relevant ads." But in May 2018, Facebook was reported to be quietly looking into ways to limit the number of users protected by Europe's tough new data law.
The Facebook founder vaguely addressed the issue of deliberate misinformation, something the company has been tackling for more than two years. Zuckerberg said the platform does not leave "harmful or divisive" content up for engagement, and that although Facebook's fake news detection practices are "not perfect," they're still working on it.
"People consistently tell us they don’t want to see this content. Advertisers don’t want their brands anywhere near it," he wrote.
With the Federal Trade Commission reportedly considering a "record-setting" fine for Facebook after an investigation into its privacy practices, transparency now seems to be a priority for Zuckerberg. But he could be a little more transparent about his defense strategy itself.
Topics Facebook Privacy Social Media
The Lincoln Project is giving liberals something no one else canUber and LyftA comprehensive breakdown of Donald Trump's absurd, unofficial 2020 campaign adInstagram husband's parody wellness account is comedy goldRobocalls, WeChat messages, and more spread misinformation on Election DayMale beauty blogger transforms into Emma Watson and it's uncannyThe Gap's hilariously bad unity sweatshirt accidentally unites people who hate itMischievous pup who found the wrong side of the law is still a very good dogApple to hold another event on November 10Twitter puts warning label on Trump's false election tweetDonald Trump’s teleprompter is back from vacation to denounce racismSean Connery, famed James Bond actor, is dead at 90Robocalls, WeChat messages, and more spread misinformation on Election DayWatch a NASA spacecraft approach and touch down on asteroid BennuBiden/Harris campaign coming to Fortnite ahead of Election DayA rare white moose has been spotted and if you wanna freak out, that's coolDriverless race car sums up 2020 by swerving into a wall for no reasonThe Lincoln Project is giving liberals something no one else can'Baby Shark' is now the most watched YouTube video of all timeChelsea Clinton calls on Trump to apologize for 'vile and wrong' tweet Want a Metaphor for Life? Look to the Struggles of the Switch Remembering Joanne Kyger (1934 High Fade: Bryan Washington on the Intimacy of a Haircut Staff Picks: Taipei Story, Robert Altman, Samantha Hunt, and More Making Theater: An Interview with Elizabeth LeCompte What Does It Mean to Be Smart? Five Koans on Intelligence Getting Out Alive: Rethinking the End of “Goodbye, Columbus” Whiting Awards 2017: Tony Tulathimutte, Fiction Mike Powell: Why I Live Where I Live Dream a Little Dream of Me: An Interview with Pénélope Bagieu Whiting Awards 2017: Francisco Cantú, Nonfiction Instagram Has Killed the Allure of the Volkswagen Van Whiting Awards 2017: Lisa Halliday, Fiction Times Are Hard, But At Least Our Wallpaper Is Arsenic Cows and Clouds: Lois Dodd’s Early Paintings Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s ‘Americanah’ Selected for “One Book, One New York” ¡Figaro! 90210, a New Adaptation, Takes Immigrants’ Rights to the Opera This Oxford Comma Is for You, the Working Man How ‘Les Misérables’ Was the Biggest Deal in Book History The Victorian Fantasy of the North Pole Was the Opposite of Ours
2.2197s , 10132.6015625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【En la intimidad】,Wisdom Convergence Information Network